Conciliar Post

Myths of the Apocrypha – Part III

Welcome back to the third and final “Myths of the Apocrypha!” In the first article, we asked whether Roman Catholics inserted seven “apocrypha” books into their canon to disprove Martin Luther. In the second, we asked whether early Christians rejected those same books for containing false teachings. Today, we ask the big question: “Did Jesus and His apostles quote any of these seven books?”

 

 

I have offered seven books for consideration: Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach, Baruch, Judith, Tobit, 1 Maccabees, and 2 Maccabees. For those who are new to the series, I will repeat just two key ideas. First, these seven books were confirmed as Scripture prior to the Reformation not just by Rome, but by all four deeply divided sections of Christianity which even then spanned the globe from Denmark to India to Russia to Ethiopia. The myth that Rome inserted these books after the Reformation makes no sense in light of the global Christian affirmation of all seven books by Christians who had been divided from Rome by church schisms for 500 to 1,000 years before the Reformation.

Second, the word “apocrypha” itself did not refer in the early church to these seven books. In the first centuries, the word “apocrypha” referred to Gnostic, heretical writings which the apostolic line of bishops always rejected everywhere in the world. I do not insult these seven books by calling them “apocrypha,” but as the “wider canon.”

 

THE HEART OF THE QUESTION

We ask today whether Jesus and His apostles quoted the wider canon. The popular myth is that these seven books are not Scripture and can be rejected as Scripture because Jesus and His apostles did not quote any of the seven. Yet if this idea were used consistently, we would have to reject not just seven books of the Old Testament, but several more books including Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther, Song of Solomon, Lamentations, Obadiah, Nahum, and Zephaniah.

I will offer just four quotes of the wider canon in the New Testament, acknowledging that none of these four are preceded with “as it is written.” If the reader does not wish to acknowledge the wider canon, these four quotes will not likely change minds. Yet if we reject the wider canon as Scripture, then we also reject 1,500 years of global Christianity. When Jesus prophesied that the gates of hell would not prevail against his Church, I submit that his words make it impossible for all four branches of Christianity all over the world to have fallen into the grievous error of calling apocryphal writings holy Scripture for 1,500 years. Those who reject the wider canon unintentionally accuse Christianity of worldwide heresy from the earliest centuries, unchecked by God until the Protestant revelation.

 

QUOTED PHRASES

Without further ado, I offer just four phrases from the wider canon which appear to have been quoted word for word in the New Testament. Defenders of the wider canon often list many passages which appear to be referenced in the New Testament. Protestant Bible scholars Kurt and Barbara Aland list over 300 New Testament references to the wider canon in the 27th Edition of the Nestle-Aland Greek New Testament. Not only are the Alands Protestants, but they are considered by many to be the among the greatest New Testament scholars of the 20th century. Rather than offering New Testament references here, I present just four quotations for consideration:

 

From Tobit 7:18, “Lord of heaven and earth” is duplicated word for word in Matthew 11:25, Luke 10:21, and Acts 17:24. Surprisingly, this phrase is not used anywhere else in the Old Testament.

From 1 Maccabees 2:50, “zealous for the law” is duplicated word for word in Acts 21:20 and employed in Philippians 3:5-6. The phrase occurs nowhere else in the Old Testament.

From Sirach 5:11, “swift to listen” is duplicated in James 1:19. It occurs nowhere else in the Old Testament.

From 2 Maccabees 13:4, “King of Kings” is duplicated word for word in reference to God in 1 Timothy 6:15, Revelation 17:14, and Revelation 19:16. This phrase is only used for pagan kings elsewhere in the Old Testament. Only in 2 Maccabees is it applied to God as the New Testament uses it.

 

PROPHECIES OF JESUS

I close now with prophecies of Jesus which were written in the wider canon. The Orthodox Study Bible affirms these as prophetic in the study notes of each passage, and I am optimistic that their inspired nature will be obvious to any Christian:

 

 

CONCLUSION

Thank you for tuning in to “Myths of the Apocrypha!” I pray this series has benefitted many. It saddens me that most Protestants do not have the joy of seven scriptures which all four divided branches of Christianity affirmed as divinely inspired long before the Reformation. The gates of hell did not prevail against the church of the Son of God; she cannot have unanimously blasphemed God by calling seven books Scripture all around the world which were instead apocryphal. Despite the best intentions of the Reformers, they made some serious mistakes, mistakes which can be corrected today.

View Sources

Scripture taken from the St. Athanasius Academy Septuagint. Copyright 2008 by St. Athanasius Academy of Orthodox Theology. Used by permission. All rights reserved.

Exit mobile version