In this article, I will give a short overview of the function, place, and authority of the Christian Bible in the Eastern Orthodox tradition. First, it must be noted that I am not, as of the writing of this post, an official member of the Orthodox Church. My family is currently attending a Greek Orthodox Church and plan to join the Church in the near future. The view of the Bible outlined in this post is one factor, among many, that led to my exploration of Christian Orthodoxy.

If an Orthodox view of the Bible can be summed up in a single statement, it might be stated as: The Bible is a tradition of the Church. “Of the Church” meaning that it emerged from decisions made by those within the Church. It is the Church that preserved the texts that are found within the Christian canon and it is the Church that decided which books would be included. It is for this reason that the Orthodox Church believes the Bible must be interpreted from inside the Church. The Bible belongs to the Church, not the Church to the Bible. As Bishop Timothy (Kallistos) Ware states in his book The Orthodox Church:

“It is from the Church that the Bible ultimately derives its authority, for it was the Church which originally decides which books form a part of Holy Scriptures; and it is the Church alone which can interpret Holy Scriptures with authority. There are many sayings in the Bible which by themselves are far from clear, and individual readers, however sincere, are in danger of error if they trust their own personal interpretation.”1

This is why Orthodox theologians argue that the Bible must be read with the “mind of the Church.” The Orthodox Church believes that reading the Bible as the body of Christ prevents the kind of scriptural misuse we see today in forms such as “rapture” theology and prosperity gospel teachings. Orthodox Christians view the Bible as one of several important sources of authority. The doctrinal formulations of the seven Ecumenical Councils and the writings of the Church Fathers constitute additional authorities to help Christians on their path to God.

It should be no surprise to learn that the Bible did not drop from the sky in the English King James Version so popular today. The Bible actually had a long, slow, and methodical history of development. The Orthodox Church has always understood this. This is why the Church is not necessarily opposed to a critical academic approach to studying scripture. “Christianity, if true, has nothing to fear from honest inquiry. Orthodoxy…does not forbid the critical and historical study of the Bible, although hitherto Orthodox scholars have not been prominent in this field” says Bishop Kallistos Ware.2 In an essay in The Orthodox Study Bible, Bishop Ware also notes that the Bible is a collection of writings “composed at various times, by different persons in widely diverse situations” and that “our reasoning brain is a gift from God…we Christians neglect at our own peril the results of independent scholarly research into the origin, dates and authorship of the books of the Bible, although we shall always want to test these results in light of Holy Tradition.”3

On the other hand, efforts to find the “original” meaning of a text could serve to detract from the ability of scripture to speak to all Christians in all ages; the never-ending desire to find an “untainted, original” translation of either the Old or New Testaments misses the point that God and His message cannot be contained within any single text or confined to a single language.

According to Andrew Louth, professor of Patristic and Byzantine studies at Durham University in England:

“Scholarly interpretation has been governed by an overriding concern to establish the original text and meaning. But there are many circumstances in which this is either not appropriate or not the whole story. For the Scriptures do not simply belong to their original context: they have been read and re-read over the centuries. When we venerate the Book of the Gospels, we are acknowledging it as something that belongs to the present: it bodies Christ forth now…we are dealing with a living text.”4

According to Fr. Anthony Coniaris, founder and president of Light & Life Publishing:

 “The Orthodox Church does not believe that every word in the Bible was dictated by God verbatim and written down word for word by the person who wrote each book. Such an approach would accuse God of using people as tape recorders – a notion that both dishonors God and destroys man.”5

Fr. Coniaris goes on to quote Fr. Theodore Stylianopoulos, a New Testament scholar at Holy Cross Greek Orthodox School of Theology, in saying that the Bible should be seen as a “record of truth and not truth itself” since the Church sees the truth as “God alone.” This view, according to Fr. Stylianopoulos, opens the door to other “records of the experience of God, such as the writings of the Church Fathers, the liturgical forms and texts, and the decisions of the Ecumenical Councils. It rescues the Church from an exclusive focus on the Bible…and thus guards Orthodox life from the error of idolatrous veneration of the text of Scripture (bibliolatry).” For Fr. Coniaris, this is crucial since “God kept on talking even after His Book had gone to press.”6

We often forget that the earliest churches had no Bibles to place in their pews. In fact, the early Church had no conception of what we call the Bible today. They had scripture to be sure, but it took centuries of prayer, debate, and critical study to determine which works were authentic and which should be deemed heretical. Thus, for the early church these documents were not put together in a single book. Even today, the gospels and epistles are read from different books during Orthodox Church services. This leads to another point regarding how the Orthodox Church views the Bible. There is a hierarchy that gives some texts priority over others.7 The book containing the four canonical gospels is given special reverence above and beyond that given to the epistles and other texts. Every Divine Liturgy, the main service of the Orthodox Church, features one reading from the gospels and one from the epistles, but the Old Testament is only read during special services for the purpose of showing how Christ was the fulfillment of the scriptures of ancient Israel.

As a living, divinely-inspired icon of Christ, the texts found within the Bible should be read for the sole purpose of leading Christians to communion with God through Jesus Christ. Any reading that deviates from this purpose is a misreading. This why Orthodox theologians insist that the Bible should not read in an ultra-literal way that seeks scientific or historical truths. The Bible must be read spiritually with the Holy Spirit guiding the Church. When read in this way, the Bible is always spiritually true, even when not literally true.

[wpex more=”View Sources” less=”Hide Sources”]

[1] Timothy Ware, The Orthodox Church (New York: Penguin, 1997), 199.

[2] Ware, The Orthodox Church, 201.

[3] Timothy Ware, “How to Read the Bible,” The Orthodox Study Bible (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2008), 1758.

[4] Andrew Louth, Introducing Eastern Orthodox Theology (Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2013), 9.

[5] Anthony M. Coniaris, Introducing the Orthodox Church: Its Faith and Life (Minneapolis: Light & Life Publishing, 1982), 205.

[6] Coniaris, Introducing the Orthodox Church, 205-206.

[7] Louth, Introducing Eastern Orthodox Theology, 13.

(Picture by Christopher Chan)[/wpex]

7 responses to “The Bible in the Eastern Orthodox Tradition”

  1. Ben Cabe Avatar

    Great post, Chris. You’re right. The early Christian’s didn’t have a Bible. In fact, the first person to list together all of the books we have in the New Testament today was St. Athansius in his Paschal Letter (c. 365). Ultimately, the Bible is not an end in itself. It is meant, as you said, to lead people to Christ. But even so, it should be read in context. Jake has done some awesome work on showing that the authority in the early Church was not the Bible, per se, but rather, Jesus Christ from whom the Apostles / Writings were considered “authoritative”

    1. Chris Cam Smith Avatar

      Great point! Yeah, I need to read some of the stuff Jake has recommended to get me up to speed on the canonization process.

      1. Ben Cabe Avatar

        Also, there is evidence that the Codex was propagated / found it’s footing by Christian’s so they could have several letters bound together. I don’t know a ton about that, but it’s interesting nonetheless.

  2. Benjamin Winter Avatar
    Benjamin Winter

    Hey Chris, really (really) enjoyed your post. How would you respond to the following:

    On the one hand, you state that “As a living, divinely-inspired icon of Christ, the texts found within the Bible should be read for the sole purpose of leading Christians to communion with God through Jesus Christ. Any reading that deviates from this purpose is a misreading.” On the other hand, you also mention (quoting Ware) that “the Bible is a collection of writings ‘composed at various times, by different persons in widely diverse situations’ and that ‘our reasoning brain is a gift from God…we Christians neglect at our own peril the results of independent scholarly research into the origin, dates and authorship of the books of the Bible, although we shall always want to test these results in light of Holy Tradition.’” There is definitely tension here, as many academic authors who are not Christians contribute to the field of exegesis. Catholics are faced with the same problem, and respond similarly, but perhaps with a bit more embracement of higher criticism given Divino Afflante Spiritu. Is Ware one of the only big names in Orthodox circles trying to swing the pendulum closer to engagement with text-critical methods, or do you see this on the ground in your parish as well? Ben or anyone else who’s Orthodox feel free to respond. I will eventually write some posts on exegesis in the Catholic tradition, where I’ll expand more on what I meant by the Church embracing higher criticism.

    1. Chris Cam Smith Avatar

      Yeah, Bishop Ware does get a lot of flak from the deeply conservative elements in the Church. I’m still really new at the parish my family attends, but his books can be found in our library. I’ve listened to several podcasts and read books where Orthodox theologians really engage the historical context at a level you won’t find in say a Baptist church. That was my point in quoting Ware on higher criticism.

    2. Chris Cam Smith Avatar

      I look forward to reading your thoughts on Catholicism and higher criticism.

      1. Benjamin Winter Avatar
        Benjamin Winter

        Thanks, although we shall see how many weeks or months go by before I actually articulate them here =) 😉

Leave a Reply

Conciliar Post

Conciliar Post is an online community and archive devoted to thoughtful Christian reflection. Since its founding, the site has published theological conversations, reflections on Christianity, reviews, and commentary on culture and current events from a Christian perspective.

Top Posts

The Old Testament in OrderDecember 13, 2024Jacob Prahlow
How the Christ Defined the ChristianAugust 15, 2025Matthew Bryan
The New Testament in OrderApril 14, 2021Jacob Prahlow
Why Liturgy?December 2, 2016Wesley Walker
The (Actual) Good PlaceSeptember 30, 2024Jacob Prahlow

Discover more from Conciliar Post

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading