One of the largest controversies within Christianity has been the rise of three movements associated with the fresh indwelling of the Holy Spirit. I consider myself to be a part of the Spirit-filled traditions. The confession of sin and acceptance of Christ as Lord and Savior does not necessarily bring this baptism of the Spirit. There have now been three ‘waves’ of the Spirit: Pentecostal, Charismatic and Third Wave movements. Each of these has placed an emphasis on being filled with the Holy Spirit. Many times there are objections from those outside about what they see in these churches. Manifestations of the Holy Spirit, emotionalism, speaking in tongues, and ‘falling out’ in the Spirit have made people feel uncomfortable. But here are some of the things that Jesus and the Apostles have told us.

In the Gospel of John, Christ tells His disciples that when He leaves them the Father will send to them the Holy Spirit:

But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you (Jn. 14:26).1

At His ascension Jesus again told His disciples about the coming of the Spirit:

But ye shall receive power, after that the holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth (Acts 1:8).

The Holy Spirit would deliver both comfort and power to Christ’s followers on Pentecost. On that day Peter and company spoke in foreign tongues and, under the influence of the Holy Spirit, brought three thousand people to belief in Christ Jesus. Throughout the book of Acts there are accounts of healings, prophecy, a resurrection from the dead, and other phenomena that were all wrought by the Spirit.

Many have told me that the Comforter was given to us at the moment we embraced Christ as our Savior; but within the many verses of the Acts of the Apostles there is a passage that I, as of yet, have not heard anyone mention:

And it came to pass, that, while Apollos was at Corinth, Paul having passed through the upper coasts came to Ephesus: and finding certain disciples,

He said unto them, Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost.

And he said unto them, Unto what then were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John’s baptism.

Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.

When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus (Acts 19:1-5).

Notice that the author writes of two baptisms, one of John the Baptist and the other of Jesus Christ. The believers that the Apostle Paul encountered had received John’s baptism, but were unaware that there was such a thing as the Holy Spirit. In this circumstance, Paul saw fit that they should also be baptized in Jesus Christ. How is this different from John’s baptism? John the Baptist himself explained the existence of two baptisms and their different natures:

I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire (Matt. 3:11).

The forerunner of the Messiah prophesied a second baptism that was much different than what he was offering. It is apparent that this is referring to Pentecost, when tongues of fire came onto the Christ followers who were waiting in the upper room. If this was the event that John was referring to, why did Paul have to baptize others in the name of Christ? This is because, just as being baptized with water is a choice, so too is being baptized with fire, even if you have already accepted Christ’s invitation.


[wpex more=”View Sources” less=”Hide Sources”]

1. All Scripture quotations, unless otherwise indicated, are taken from the King James Version. KJV. Public Domain.

Featured Image:

“flaming gold” by paloetic is licensed under CC BY 2.0

[/wpex]

One response to ““Unto What Then Were Ye Baptized?””

  1. Charles Heyworth Avatar

    C.T., good question! It has been interesting for me to explore the before/after experience of the baptism of the Holy Spirit. Though I am part of the charismatic tradition, I remain undecided as to the significance of a second baptism.

    In my context, the church I was part of believed that it was necessary. The church leaders prayed for me to receive the Holy Spirit until I let some unintelligible words come out of my mouth. Were it not that this event precipitated a major transformation of my life that I wrote about in “Road to Royalty” I would not give it much significance. My reason for this is that the various “evidences” of this baptism had been somewhat present in my life before the event took place. Additionally, I have many friends who are not part of the Charismatic tradition who would denounce the belief in the baptism of the Holy Spirit that actually operate in the gifts of the spirit. I also know some unbelievers who give “evidences” of baptism into Christianity.

    The conclusion that I currently hold is that baptism is a symbolic recognition of something that exists (whether water baptism or holy spirit baptism). Accepting and embracing a certain truth as part of one’s identity can have incredible effects and I would recommend it for anyone.

    What are your thoughts?

Leave a Reply

Conciliar Post

Conciliar Post is an online community and archive devoted to thoughtful Christian reflection. Since its founding, the site has published theological conversations, reflections on Christianity, reviews, and commentary on culture and current events from a Christian perspective.

Top Posts

The Old Testament in OrderDecember 13, 2024Jacob Prahlow
The New Testament in OrderApril 14, 2021Jacob Prahlow
The Phoebe ProblemFebruary 16, 2022Jacob Prahlow
A Brief History of Communion (Part I)February 14, 2017Jacob Prahlow