What practices, beliefs, and people qualify as Christian? How broad is the umbrella of Christianity? How might orthodox Christians learn from, even submit to, the wisdom of deviant “Christian” traditions? Within a new series of articles, what I’m calling “Sects Positions,” I’m going to examine these questions while looking at the beliefs of the fringes of Christianity, groups that many would not consider true Christians. In particular, I will be engaging with the Jehovah’s Witnesses and Mormons, two religions that believe themselves to be the proclaimers of the true gospel, the fullest expression of prophecy and revelation, and the restorers of God’s church. When most mainstream Christians encounter these peculiar traditions, they are quick to denounce them as cults and heretics, hoping to create as much distance between them and orthodox Christianity (just do a quick google search, the apologetics websites are endless). What I am hoping to do in this series, however, is to examine precisely where these traditions differ from mainstream Christianity, and to see these critiques as opportunities for mainstream Christianity to clarify itself, revealing what Christianity Today calls a “beautiful orthodoxy.”1

Over the course of this series, I will begin by examining the fascinating history of the Jehovah’s Witnesses failed attempts to predict the exact date of Christ’s return, and then over the course of a few articles move into an extended review and discussion of Dr. Terryl L. Givens’s recently released Wrestling the Angel , considered “The most comprehensive account of the development of Mormon thought ever written.” Though some may believe a detailed, even sometimes sympathetic, discussion of an unorthodox tradition to be foolish, I hope this series promotes understanding and dialogue, rather than diatribe.

Jehovah’s Witnesses

The current organization of Jehovah’s Witnesses was born out of charismatic personalities, a time of expectation of the imminent return of Christ, and intense small group bible study. In the late 1870, a man by the name of Charles Taze Russell started a bible study to examine traditional Christian doctrine, the group coming to the realization that the trinity and eternal torment of the damned were not supported by the Bible (today’s Jehovah’s Witnesses also reject the divinity of Jesus). Hoping to spread his views to a wider audience, Russell started the Zion’s Watch Tower Tract Society, a precursor to the modern Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, the “governing body” of all Jehovah’s Witnesses that considers itself the “faithful and discreet slave” of Matthew 24. This Society proliferated, through the medium of the newspaper, millions of his sermons, books on Christian living, and systematic dispensationalist treatments of the scriptures. He believed, using pyramidology, that Christ had returned invisibly in 1874, and had started ruling in heaven in 1878.2

The key date for Russell was to come in 1914, in which the “Gentile times” would come to a close, Armageddon would end, and paradise would exist on earth.3 Unfortunately for him, Russell’s prediction did not come true, and he and his prophecies perished soon thereafter. Joseph Franklin Rutherford was then elected the next president of the Watch Tower Society, soon reorganizing the prophecies of Russell around 1925 as the new end of the world, and 1914 as the beginning of the last days, the “start of Christ’s invisible presence,” and the start of his kingly rule in heaven. “Millions Now Living Will Never Die,” was the cry of Rutherford and his faithful followers.4 Again, unfortunately for Rutherford, this did not come true, and the Watch Tower again downplayed the importance of the prediction and reformed its theology. The authoritative magazine of the church, The Watchtower, contains a litany of prophecies between the years of 1925 and 1975. These include the prediction in 1935 by certain elected elders that God would “overthrow Christendom”, the proclamation in September of 1941 that that we are only a precious few “remaining months before Armageddon”, and the promotion of the idea that just as Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 AD, thirty-seven years after the death of Christ, that 1951 (thirty-seven years after 1914) would be the year of God’s destruction of apostate Christendom.5

The most important of the Jehovah’s Witnesses failed (or true? One can never tell) prophecies was in the ripe year of 1975. According to one Witness’s writing, humankind was created in 4026 B.C., the first six thousand years of mankind will end in 1975, and we will then enter into the seventh day, a thousand year “Sabbath period of rest and release.” A District Overseer told the masses at a District Convention, “[Jehovah] has held up for us a new goal, a new year. Something to reach out for, and it just seems it has given us so much more energy and power in a final burst of speed to the finish line. And that’s the year 1975. As one brother put it, “Stay Alive to ’75.” Though this prophecy eventually floundered (and growth rates of the religion plummeted), in between 1975 and 2000, there were numerous suggestions that the “day of Jehovah” would “be completed in our 20th century.”6

I don’t know about you, but I find this theology of the end times very attractive. Christian eschatology too often feels dry and distant, devoid of day-to-day significance, lacking in “energy and power” for the long and arduous race to the finish line. Uncertainty ubiquitously fills our finite life, and God seems so hidden in the midst of it. All of these difficult and seemingly worthless work weeks, random wars going on in foreign nations, injustices continuing in our communities, parents and grandparents are dying or on the brink of death, is God really coming to rescue and restore this world?

I think that Jehovah’s Witnesses tradition of prophecies, though deeply flawed, have a grip on some of the deepest longings of the human heart. I want a Sabbath rest in which God takes care of the brokenness of the world, who places me in a paradise that is utterly unlike the world in which we currently inhabit. I want a new goal and a new year, energy and power that I can grasp onto to keep me physically, mentally, and emotionally engaged. I want a book of scriptures, a display of miracles, and a loving God that can tell me rest is to come, that I get to be a part on a restored Earth, and that a savior is about to return for me.

And these longings are true and beautiful. The failed prophecies of the Jehovah’s Witnesses, I believe, should not primarily be regarded as falsehoods awaiting historical rebuttal, but as a magnifying glass on beautiful orthodoxy’s response to our situation as human beings. Fortunately for the church catholic, our future doesn’t depend on fallible human prophecy, but on a person who promises that our longings are to be fulfilled in him. The assurance of God’s work in the world comes not from humanity’s ascent to know when God will return, but in the truth and beauty of God’s descent into human history. It seems that the Jehovah’s Witnesses incessant cry to know the timing of Christ’s return (a time in which Jesus himself said “You will neither know the day or hour) reveals a number of (sometimes unsettling) paradoxes within the Christian faith. God is hidden in his invisibility and otherness, yet revealed in creation, covenant, and the coming of Christ. The Scriptures are silent on the exact hour of God’s restoration of all things to himself, yet we believe Jesus will one day wipe away every tear, dealing away justly with sin and death. God’s people are continually in a state of waiting for what is to come next, yet resting in the salvation of the cross and the victory of the resurrection that has come before us. In this time of the year when the true church calendar becomes most serious and reflective, let us learn from the longings within the failed calendar of the Jehovah’s Witnesses, knowing that Christ has come and will come again.

[wpex more=”View Sources” less=”Hide Sources”]

1. Katelyn Beaty, “Why We Need a Beautiful Orthodoxy,” Christianity Today, http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2015/januaryfebruary/why-we-need-beautiful-orthodoxy.html

2. You’ll have to forgive me for utilizing second-hand resources in this article, the websites used cite the primary sources
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Taze_Russell

3. Paul Grundy, “1914: The Failed Watchtower Prophecy,” http://www.jwfacts.com/watchtower/failed-1914-predictions.php

4. Paul Grundy, “1925 – “Millions Now Living Will Never Die””, http://www.jwfacts.com/watchtower/1925.php

5. Paul Grundy, “Changed Dates :: Failed Predictions,” http://www.jwfacts.com/watchtower/1800s.php

6. Paul Grundy, “1975 – Watchtower Quotes,” http://jwfacts.com/watchtower/1975.php

Image of “Jehovah’s Witness Art” taken from Chris Dorward at https://www.flickr.com/photos/listingslab/597853275/%5B/wpex%5D

23 responses to “Sects Positions: Jehovah’s Witnesses and the End of the World”

  1. Ben Cabe Avatar

    I find this article interesting when juxtaposed against your last article on the end times. I would be cautious just in that these kind of “longings” could lead to the popular escapism of modern fundamentalism. That being said, the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ doctrine on (or against, rather) the trinity and deity of Jesus Christ is quite disturbing and can in no way be contrasted with “o”rthodoxy. Heresies are attractive—the apple was attractive—but I would not necessarily say that this attractiveness is due to some inherent truth.

    1. George Aldhizer Avatar
      George Aldhizer

      Hey Ben, I’m trying to understand what you are saying with your comment. Are you disagreeing with the premise of the series? Do you feel like I’m conceding ground or not being hard on heresy? What do you find interesting about the juxtaposition of my two articles? I’m just trying to understand your comment.

      Certainly, I think that the Jehovah’s witnesses represent a fundamentalism that resulted from their longings. I don’t find their longings to be problematic, only the way they try to deal with them.

      1. Ben Cabe Avatar

        I wondered if that was too cryptic. Perhaps I read your article wrong—thinking that you were saying that, because it’s attractive, it has some inherent truth in it. However, I am not convinced that is what you were saying.

      2. George Aldhizer Avatar
        George Aldhizer

        I mean, I think there is great truth is longing for a God to make Earth right. But certainly not in the way JW’s handle it. But yeah, just because something is attractive doesn’t make it true.

  2. Ben Cabe Avatar

    Yikes.

  3. Ben Cabe Avatar

    What’s interesting to me about this kind of thing is that, ex-co-workers of mine who were “anti” big O Orthodox often claim the persecution of the Eastern church as their own. Posting to Facebook about it and claiming it, etc. They seem to be unaware that these are Orthodox Christians which means they are distinctly not protestant.

    That being said, yes the 21 were copts. But as far as I’m concerned, a martyr is a martyr—copt, protestant, Orthodox. That takes courage—a real faith. It’s all a mystery. Once again, a fragmented thought in written comment!

  4. George Aldhizer Avatar
    George Aldhizer

    I think for the purposes of my series my central concern will not be to define who is in and who is out. I think I will be doing that, yes, but not as the center of what I care about in digging into jw and Mormon theology.

    But, I would love to hear if you think I should be doing things differently. I’m open to criticism.

    1. George Aldhizer Avatar
      George Aldhizer

      Yeahhhh, thanks Chris. I’m trying to be aware of that. It’s difficult, because I don’t want to minimize the fact that these prophecies are wrong and Jesus is God, etc etc. But I think that that task is not where I’m primarily headed, but I don’t want to leave the uninitiated feeling like JW and Mormonism are the way to go.

      I think that’s why I’m hoping to present Mormonism in its best light, in order to say that orthodox Christianity addresses the critiques Mormonism has of it, and is actually more beautiful and truthful. The JW’s, in all actuality, are more of a joke theologically when compared with Mormonism. Mormonism actually has a pretty robust theology, not one that is easily tossed away like the failed prophecies of JW.

    2. Ben Cabe Avatar

      Gotcha!

  5. George Aldhizer Avatar
    George Aldhizer

    Mind. Blown.

  6. Chris Cam Smith Avatar

    I definitely appreciate the idea of trying to explain these groups as they understand themselves, being respectful and truthful, while at the same time remaining faithful to the orthodox view of Christianity. We Christians have a duty to understand other faiths/sects/etc. as they understand themselves, not through the lens of our own theology. It is only then, that we can have fruitful dialogue about theology. I know you and Ben have had some very intense theological discussions and they work out for the better when the two of you understand each other’s position fully.

    I like the question Chris brought up about who gets to decide who is and who is not a “Christian.” I know when I agreed to write for this site, I was asked to pledge allegiance to the orthodox (little “o”) view of the Trinity and dual nature of Christ, which I have no problem with because that is the view I adhere to. Certainly, by that definition Mormons, JWs, Quakers, and “Oneness” Pentecostals are out. We would have to expand the definition of Christianity to any group that places Jesus as the center of their faith, even if denying that Jesus was himself God Incarnate. Important discussion for another day I guess…

    1. George Aldhizer Avatar
      George Aldhizer

      Yeah, I’d love to hear us explore that question. You seem sympathetic to expanding the horizon of what should be considered “Christian”? The Mormons, as we will see, are I think far closer to the historic Christian faith, especially in their insistence on Christ’s divinity and saving grace.

      1. Ben Cabe Avatar

        Yikes. How much do you know about Mormonism?

      2. George Aldhizer Avatar
        George Aldhizer

        I’m not understanding the question. Help me out

      3. Ben Cabe Avatar

        I guess I would just heartily disagree about Mormonism being close to historic Christianity.

      4. George Aldhizer Avatar
        George Aldhizer

        I feel like you aren’t reading my article/comments charitably. I wrote “closer,” and gave certain examples. Please ask me probing questions if you disagree, but I don’t appreciate “yikes” and “do you know what you are talking about?”

      5. Ben Cabe Avatar

        You’re right. My apologies

      6. George Aldhizer Avatar
        George Aldhizer

        I forgive you. It’s cool. Looking forward to hearing what you think of my future discussion of Mormonism. It’s so very close to historic christianity in some (key) ways, and so so far in many others

      7. Chris Cam Smith Avatar

        I think Mormonism is different enough to be considered a different religion based on two key aspects – a new prophet and a new scripture. But I think they definitely fall into the category of Judeo-Christian or Abrahamic monotheism. I think the term “orthodox” with the lower-case “o” is the better term than “Christian” for separating what all of us believe as writers on this site (namely, the dual nature of Christ and God as Trinity) from what other non-orthodox groups believe. I personally don’t believe I have the authority to say who can or can’t call themselves “Christian.” I can, however, say what I believe one “ought” to do or believe if one calls themselves a “Christian.” Certainly, if were speaking in scholarly terms, Mormonism, JWs, and other non-orthodox sects fall into the broad family of Christian(ic) religions. This is of course categorically speaking, not theologically.

      8. George Aldhizer Avatar
        George Aldhizer

        Yeah, gotcha. I like the categorical vs. theological distinction. Looking forward to continuing this conversation throughout the series

  7. masoyama Avatar
    masoyama

    [This was originally written in response to my Sister, Sarah.]

    My Sister, I do not write this to you.

    Young brothers, try not to: write/input a response within 20 minutes of another’s posting; post
    without your wife, or a trusted brother/sister reading your post before
    you post it; post after 10:00 your local time; post while having had
    beer or other alcohol within the previous four hours. What you post is
    “forever.”

    I have been reading some of the responses, and wonder at why one would respond so quickly, seemingly with not much forethought.

    Many of you are so beautiful, but now some of you have made responses so
    indelicately. Not, necessarily to this post, but to the post post by
    brother George.

    God is so good; and He is with us!

    As an aside, George, that is also my name. I have worked with cults for many years; family being JW and also Mormons, and just plain sinners!

    Have you read the Tanners? This would be a good place to start regarding Mormonism. Or at least to display perspective.

    God bless you, my brother, as you seek.

    1. George Aldhizer Avatar
      George Aldhizer

      Thanks for your recommendation of the Tanners as a resource. I’d love to hear you expand on how you have worked with the JW’s and Mormons over the years.

      Please, I’d love to hear your advice on my comments, are you responding to something I’ve written? I appreciate your advice regarding comments.

      1. Bartimus Avatar
        Bartimus

        I’m sorry it took so long for me to get back with you.

        My wife and I formerly worked in apologetics and cult ministries at university.

        George, I think that you are correct about the JWs, with the lack of theological development, but be sure, they are sincere. They are looking for something. What will we, as Christians, offer them? First, I hope, love. A radiant love that cannot be denied.

        All mankind is looking for love, and we Christians should be shining so that they can see our love for them. It is not simply about winning an argument, or having more firepower. Rather, when we were “successful,” our love is what was apparent to them. The time we spent on our knees in private for them was a strong correlating factor for our love for them.

        Sincerity, however, does not mean right belief, or right teaching. I remember, and you may have already discussed this, that on many occasions with Mormon friends when they would speak about “the burning in the bosom,” suggesting that passion, or real belief, was a/the thing that would suggest authenticity of belief and doctrine. Be careful, George, with the understanding of words, with Mormons. Words, and concepts, need to be defined. I have sat on several occasions with probably the most well known Mormon in this country (to those not Mormon, that is; and not Mitt Romney), and he is a very good man. He is sincere. He treats his wife better than I treat beloved. He, I believe, is more kind to his children than I. When we discuss Christianity, however, I am more aware of the beliefs of Mormonism than he. He admits that. But, and this is key, the defining of terms is where we have challenges. “God,” “one true God,” “only God,” “Son of god,” “Christian,” “gospel,” and other such terms have to be defined. Because the Latter-Day-Saints definition of these and more terms are different than the way in which we might define them.

        If you need some advice, or clarification, or even anything at all, please feel free to contact me. You are, it seems, beginning where I began 28 years ago. God bless you, and your ministry, George.

        Shalom

Leave a Reply

Conciliar Post

Conciliar Post is an online community and archive devoted to thoughtful Christian reflection. Since its founding, the site has published theological conversations, reflections on Christianity, reviews, and commentary on culture and current events from a Christian perspective.

Top Posts

The Old Testament in OrderDecember 13, 2024Jacob Prahlow
The New Testament in OrderApril 14, 2021Jacob Prahlow
How the Christ Defined the ChristianAugust 15, 2025Matthew Bryan
Why Liturgy?December 2, 2016Wesley Walker
A Brief History of Communion (Part I)February 14, 2017Jacob Prahlow

Discover more from Conciliar Post

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading