Saying that the last few months in America have been horrific and tragic is an understatement. America is, once again, confronted with the needless deaths of innocent people. The racial tensions in America have been laid bare for all to see again, whether we acknowledge them or not. But where do we go from here? I want to say what so many have already said before, and are still saying today, but is all too often ignored: it’s time for white Christians in America to listen.

Racism is Alive and Well

It’s unfortunate to see that so many firmly believe that racism is, for the most part, a bygone part of American history. “Sure”, you might say, “there are still racists. But systemic racism? That went away with Jim Crow.” Those who adopt this belief then chastise people who bring race into the conversation, claiming that they are just “race baiting,” “racemongerers,” or “playing the race card.” But behind this belief is a misunderstanding of sin and an unloving posture toward non-white Americans.

Sin is Generational

The toxicity of sin is prevalent in the stories of Jacob and his sons (Gen. 27, 37). Jacob, motivated by jealousy and covetousness, slaughtered a goat and used its fur to deceive his father, Isaac, into giving to Jacob what belonged to Jacob’s older brother. Many years later, Jacob’s sons, motivated by jealousy and covetousness, slaughtered a goat and used its blood to deceive Jacob into believing that his favorite son, Joseph, had been murdered. Thus Jacob the deceiver was deceived. The literary irony in these stories demonstrates the degree to which sin is ingrained and perpetuated from generation to generation.

In Not The Way It’s Supposed to Be: A Breviary of Sin, Cornelius Plantinga uses the analogy of pollution to describe sin.1 Sin infects and alters the very fabric of our families, relationships, and societies. Surprisingly, defining sin as “missing the mark” misses the point. Sin does not merely concern an individual failing to live up to a certain standard (although that is a part of it), but it infiltrates communities, rupturing the very love and peace which God intends. My question is this: if sin is a pollutant, a toxin which infects and perpetuates evil, then how can we legitimately claim that racism is no longer an issue in the United States? To use one example, it wasn’t until 1964 that the US outlawed racial discrimination. This means that every category of opportunity—whether financial, educational, or any other—that was available to whites in the 1960s was not available to so many non-white Americans at that time. Believing that government-sanctioned discrimination against certain races 60 years ago has no systemic impact on their descendants today underestimates the toxicity of sin. No, America still has a long way to go before it can claim any semblance of the equality of opportunity.

Here’s another example. The war on drugs has been widely recognized as having an explicitly racist agenda, targeting black communities. The evidence suggests as much.2 Recently, an old interview was published in which one of Nixon’s top advisors explained that the United State’s War on Drugs was initiated in order to disrupt black communities. Here’s a portion of the article about the interview,

“The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people,” former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman told Harper’s writer Dan Baum for the April cover story published Tuesday.

“You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin. And then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities,” Ehrlichman said. “We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”3

The significance of this cannot be overstated: Nixon’s domestic policy chief stated that, in 1968, the federal government deliberately issued a decree with the specific intention of targeting, disrupting, and destroying black communities. This “war on drugs” was only denounced by the US government in 2011. The systemic racism of the war on drugs is blatant, undeniable, and, unfortunately, still in effect today. The US is attempting to mitigate and alter this dreadful policy, but it’s difficult to unearth and overturn four decades of deliberately racial persecution carried out by one of the most powerful governments in the world. After all, we still have at least one vocal and unashamed white supremacist in congress and a former KKK leader running for Senate.45

As an additional but important point, white Americans take an individualistic approach to race, which misconstrues the entire issue. Racism is not only concerned with the conscious beliefs of individuals, but the systemic prevalence of oppression. As Robert DiAngelo explains, “Social scientists understand racism as a multidimensional and highly adaptive system—a system that ensures an unequal distribution of resources between racial groups. Because whites built and dominate all significant institutions, (often at the expense of and on the uncompensated labor of other groups), their interests are embedded in the foundation of US society.”6 Racial oppression is written into our laws and sewn into our soil.

Don’t take my word for it. Recent studies have shown that Americans display a widespread preference for white people, over and against other races.7 The more empirical data pours in, the more we realize how racism is deeply ingrained in America, whether we acknowledge it or not. This should not be surprising if, after all, sin does not happen in a vacuum. The belief that centuries of deeply embedded and enforced racism can disappear by the addition of an amendment to the Constitution requires one to have a biblically uninformed understanding of sin and a skewed interpretation of systemic racism in US history.

The Denial of Sin

On July 4th, the Christian rapper Lecrae caught some fire for posted this tweet:

Much of the response, while predictable, was disgusting.8 Many equivocate between the acknowledgement of American racism with hate speech. Apparently acknowledging and mourning the horrific injustices faced by African-Americans is unnecessarily divisive. However, the fact that white Americans want to silence African-American voices brings up an interesting point: The denial that racism is still a reality in the US itself constitutes evidence for the fact that racism is alive and well. The fact that Lecrae cannot bring up legitimate, undeniable historical facts because they do not align with a white-washed history shows how calloused white Americans are to the suffering of non-white victims.

The Path of Repentance

The first step toward repentance is acknowledging sin. We cannot turn from sin that we pretend does not exist. Bryan Stevenson brought up the fact that, in Berlin, acknowledgement of the holocaust is everywhere.9 Such an acknowledgement recognizes the severity of the atrocities committed, and serves as a reminder of the commitment to not repeat the sins of the holocaust. Unfortunately, America does not have the same philosophy regarding our past sins. In fact, even reminding Americans of past atrocities is a surefire method of being ostracized and denounced as treasonous. We are ignorant of systemic racism today because we are numb to the racism in our history. The first step is to call out evil for what it is for the sake of healing, love and justice.

After that first step, however, comes a new way of being. Unfortunately, America persistently refuses to engage in the ongoing process of repentance for racism. We have failed to honestly and contritely repent of racism, and, as a result, racism continues to permeate our society. The repentance required for these sins is not an event that transpires in one moment—it is not the emancipation proclamation. It is not a piece of legislation. It is not the end of the war on drugs. Repentance is a continual process. A slow, arduous process of examining the past and understanding the way it shapes our present. That process should never end.  

Quick to Listen

So what does this new way of being look like for those of us who are white Christians in America? Perhaps we should take James’s advice to be slow to speak but quick to listen (James. 1:19). We have been on the side of the oppressors, and continue to reap the benefits. Instead of lecturing non-white Americans about how to think and talk about their own suffering, perhaps we should take a more empathetic, caring approach. Have we actually sat down and listened, without interrupting, to a fellow human being describe the racism they experience on a daily basis? Have we sat down to hear a mother who lost her child in a neighborhood shootout describe the opportunities that are closed off to her and her family merely on the basis of their racial profile? I am confident that, were we to do so, we would think twice about throwing “black on black” crime statistics in her face just to silence a voice that’s been smothered for centuries. Perhaps, we may even learn the meaning of what it is to weep with those who weep. Have we wept with someone who has experienced racial degradation? Have we sat in proximity to this pain? Or does this pain merely represent a challenge to our political ideologies?

The refusal, on the part of white Americans, to listen and learn about racism shows the relevance of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s keen observation, “Whites, it must frankly be said, are not putting in a similar mass effort to reeducate themselves out of their racial ignorance. It is an aspect of their sense of superiority that the white people of America believe they have so little to learn.”10

This is a plea—to my fellow white American Christians—to stop and truly consider whether our posture is Christ-like. We are called to bear one another’s burdens. We are called to be fellow sufferers. Perhaps we should first seek to bear the burden and pain of fellow image-bearers, and then, afterward, frame our understanding of and approach to race through these shared tears.
Where should we go from here? What’s the best action to take in order to have a more loving and just society? I don’t need to know. As the story of Socrates goes, he was the wisest man in Athens not because he knew the answers, but because he was the only one aware of his own ignorance. Let’s embody that wisdom. Let’s love. And, perhaps for the first time, let’s listen. 


[wpex more=”View Sources” less=”Hide Sources”]
(1) Plantinga, Cornelius. Not the Way It’s Supposed to Be: A Breviary of Sin (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995), 39.
(2) http://www.drugpolicy.org/race-and-drug-war
(3) http://edition.cnn.com/2016/03/23/politics/john-ehrlichman-richard-nixon-drug-war-blacks-hippie/
(4) http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/19/us/politics/steve-king-nonwhite-subgroups.html
(5) http://edition.cnn.com/2016/07/22/politics/david-duke-senate-race/
(6) https://goodmenproject.com/featured-content/white-fragility-why-its-so-hard-to-talk-to-white-people-about-racism-twlm/
(7) https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/12/08/across-america-whites-are-biased-and-they-dont-even-know-it/
(8) http://thegrio.com/2016/07/05/lecrae-christian-rapper-angers-some-fans-with-his-fourth-of-july-tweet/
(9) http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article61649457.html
(10) King, Martin Luther. Where Do We Go from Here: Chaos or Community? Boston: Beacon, 2010), 10.
[/wpex]

10 responses to “Dear White Christians, It’s Time for Us to Listen”

  1. Kenneth O'Shaughnessy Avatar
    Kenneth O’Shaughnessy

    I’m not convinced most White people are saying – or even believe – that racism no longer exists in America, or that racism isn’t a problem. What they are saying is that racism does not exist in the way groups like Black Lives Matter says it does, and that their methods can do nothing but exacerbate the problems. However, the only response these groups will allow is an unequivocal assent to their definitions and demands – they do not want a dialogue. So, who is there on “the other side” who truly wants to dialogue? Who are we supposed to listen to? Is it true that, simply because we we raised in a “racist” milieu as the inheritors of “white privilege”, we cannot have an opinion or contribute to a dialogue as these groups indicate? And if that’s the case, why is it not true from the other direction? And why are all these things still true institutionally under an administration that these leaders support? There has been no change in these racist government policies in the past 8 years.

    The only place racism can be confronted and repented of is in my own heart with my own neighbors, and to whatever account I can personally hold my representatives.

    1. Kenneth O'Shaughnessy Avatar
      Kenneth O’Shaughnessy

      “Here, white flight was followed by middle-class black flight, and historically black communities in the city were razed for the sake of “urban renewal,”” This seems to agree with those who argue that the problem isn’t primarily a race problem, but a class problem.

      Also, I’m not arguing that 8 years of anybody should have solved anything, but seriously there’s no improvement or attempt at improvement other than rhetoric. None of the government policies decried above have been fixed, or even admitted.

      Prophetic speech is great, but preaching to the choir is a waste of time, and refusing to chastise those who play the victim but really aren’t is a lie. That’s what today’s race ”discussions” consist of. Sure, whites need to admit their culpability in the dissolution of the black community and offer any support they can give. But that will be worth nothing until blacks accept their own culpability for the same, and admit that nothing the whites can do will help if they don’t themselves commit to rebuilding nuclear families, stop the culture of violence on their own communities, and stop playing the helpless victims.

      In the mean time, the best way I can affect change is to hold my representatives accountable, and treat all my neighbors with the respect the image of God deserves. That isn’t too little to do, and is the place all change has to start.

    2. Micah Carlson Avatar
      Micah Carlson

      I really appreciate this article, but I do think the choice of cover photo, combined with the introductory paragraph, sets an unfortunately political tone for the rest of the piece which it’s arguments do not rest upon. There is much need to be able to talk about institutional violence, unmarked categories, and the systemic effects of racism (among other things) in the United States. There is much need for people to be able to look within themselves and perhaps find that they, too, have biases about which they were not aware, and then to work on changing those biases. For instance, does the phrase “Thirty-on percent of Americans are still prejudiced against blacks” strike a discordant note in your soul? Actual numbers notwithstanding, there is an insidious “unmarked category” of whiteness built into the sentence itself. What about black Americans? Such thought experiments can reveal biases not felt by those who are associated with the unmarked category.

      That being said, there is a lot more to our contemporary media scene than simply a desire for openness and dialogue. Using hate and fear to induce social change does not become okay simply because the voice behind the megaphone is a minority. This has been happening a lot in the past year, and that is more what I hear Kenneth speaking out against.

      Also not mentioned in the original post is what to do with secondary effects of institutional violence. So, say a young man grows up in a social unit which has historically been denied education, and as a result have a deep-seated tradition of using less-than-legal avenues for acquiring the money needed to get by. So this young man grows up learning to value eluding the law and playing “the game,” and to undervalue social structures which, although absolutely necessary for a free and safe society, have historically not been favorable to his particular well-being. This young man now has a set of antisocial values which are not conducive to a free society, even though these may not be entirely of his own making. How do we handle this young man? Should we tell our civil servants to leave him alone, because it isn’t really his fault anyway? How can we both meet this young man where he is, and continue to reform the institution which he has been set against, while not expecting the two to clash? Statistics about “black on black” violence are not simply straw-man arguments used to push a particular political ideology (although they obviously are sometimes that), they are also a reality which must be dealt with in their own right.

      So, as I see it, we really have a convoluted mess of problems piled on top of each other, none of which can be totally resolved without adequately addressing the others. We need to be progressive enough to continue to reform our political institutions to be more objective about dealing with minorities, while strong enough to be able to fight violence and command respect for those same institutions, without which the structure and general safety of our society would collapse. We need to be open-minded and humble enough to listen to those who are suffering under conditions which do not directly effect us, but honest enough to point out when someone else is simply taking advantage of that suffering for their own, counter power-play (even if they describe this play using racial buzz-words). We need to love our enemies and pray for those who persecute us, and also to remember that the government does not wield lethal force in vain, but is rather God’s tool for restraining evil in the world. We need to try hard to give everyone equal opportunity to excel in this life, but, due to the “generational” quality of sin which Jacob speaks of, this will not happen in one violent revolution, but over years of repentance and healing on both sides. And also very important, we need to be honest enough to admit that, while it is good and noble to attempt to root out institutional violence, micro-aggression, and the subtleties and economics of power with regards to race and gender, all of these things are vastly preferable to the more overt abuses we have (fortunately) come away from. We are not sliding back into a dark age, we simply are not yet in the Kingdom of Heaven. Please forgive me for presuming upon my own words, and thank you all for encouraging the love of all men in what sometimes appear to be such dark times.

    3. Micah Carlson Avatar
      Micah Carlson

      I really appreciate this article, but I do think the choice of cover photo, combined with the introductory paragraph, sets an unfortunately political tone for the rest of the piece which its arguments do not rest upon. There is much need to be able to talk about institutional violence, unmarked categories, and the systemic effects of racism (among other things) in the United States. There is much need for people to be able to look within themselves and perhaps find that they, too, have biases about which they were not previously aware, and then to work on changing those biases. For instance, does the phrase “Thirty-one percent of Americans are still prejudiced against blacks” strike a discordant note in your soul? Actual numbers notwithstanding, there is an insidious “unmarked category” of whiteness built into the sentence itself. What about black Americans? Such thought experiments can reveal biases not felt by those who are associated with the unmarked category.

      That being said, there is a lot more to our contemporary media scene than simply a desire for openness and dialogue. Using hate and fear to induce social change does not become okay simply because the voice behind the megaphone is a minority. This has been happening a lot in the past year, and that is more what I hear Kenneth speaking out against.

      Also not mentioned in the original post is what to do with the secondary (or even tertiary) effects of institutional violence. So, say a young man grows up in a social unit which has historically been denied education, and as a result has a deep-seated tradition of using less-than-legal avenues for acquiring the money needed to get by. So this young man grows up learning to value eluding the law and playing “the game,” and to undervalue social structures which, although absolutely necessary for a free and safe society, have historically not been favorable to his particular well-being. This young man now has a set of antisocial values which are not conducive to a free society, even though these may not be entirely of his own making. How do we handle this young man? Should we tell our civil servants to leave him alone, because it isn’t really his fault anyway? How can we both meet this young man where he is, and continue to reform the institution which he has been set against, while not expecting the two to clash? Statistics about “black on black” violence are not simply straw-man arguments used to push a particular political ideology (although they obviously are sometimes that), they are also a reality which must be dealt with in their own right.

      So, as I see it, we really have a convoluted mess of problems piled on top of each other, none of which can be totally resolved without adequately addressing the others. We need to be progressive enough to continue to reform our political institutions to be more objective about dealing with minorities, while strong enough to be able to fight violence and command respect for those same institutions, without which the structure and general safety of our society would collapse. We need to be open-minded and humble enough to listen to those who are suffering under conditions which do not directly affect us, but honest enough to point out when someone else is simply taking advantage of that suffering for their own, counter power-play (even if they describe this play using racial buzz-words and hashtags). We need to love our enemies and pray for those who persecute us, and also to remember that the government does not wield lethal force in vain, but is rather God’s tool for restraining evil in the world. We need to try hard to give everyone equal opportunity to excel in this life, but, due to the “generational” quality of sin which Jacob speaks of, this will not happen in one violent revolution, but over years of repentance and healing on both sides. And also very important, we need to be honest enough to admit that, while it is good and noble to attempt to root out institutional violence, micro-aggression, and the subtleties and economics of power with regards to race and gender, all of these things are vastly preferable to the more overt abuses we have (fortunately) come away from. We are not sliding back into a dark age, we simply are not yet in the Kingdom of Heaven. Please forgive me for presuming upon my own words, and thank you all for encouraging the love of all men in what sometimes appear to be such dark times.

      1. chriscamsmith Avatar
        chriscamsmith

        Raising the issue of “black on black” violence is absolutely and unequivocally a rhetorical argument used to silence critique of white supremacy. I once fell into that trap too until I learned otherwise. For one, it assumes that black people do not care or try to address the violence in their own communities – a colossal falsehood. Second, it assumes that there is something unique about “black on black” crime. The vast majority of violent crimes are committed by people of the same race as their victims.

  2. Levi Strodtman Avatar
    Levi Strodtman

    Too many blatant and untrue(though probably unintentional) assumptions in this article about the perceptions and actions of white people as a monolithic unit which has never actually been the case historically speaking, and is not the case now if you examine our current society. ” white Christians” have played the largest role by any measure in recognizing and working towards a more racially equal society in America from the founders early conception of what America should be, onward. It doesn’t appear that the author truly grasps the functionality of racism or the long lasting effects of racism and in reality is simply basing the article on assumptions that, for the most part, are inappropriate about white people. Especially white Christians. Also the article seems to misconstrue residual effects of American racism as current racism though he briefly mentioned both racism and it’s effects as separate in the article. This is another indication of a lack of understanding of racial issues in America. Any title that starts with “dear (any race)”, is probably not going to beneficial to anybody as it only furthers the idea of division within society.

  3. Kevin OReilly Avatar
    Kevin OReilly

    The only problem is institutionally speaking . . . . the premise as represented in the BLM picture above is untrue. . . particularly when it comes to the law enforcement community. It is very popular to trash whites and cops, it takes no courage to back your argument. No one calls you a troll, a hater, intolerant. Everyone says you so loving, accepting. But in the end, only the truth will set you free and the truth is not on your side of the argument.
    . . . .
    Let’s consider a sample not reaching back to 1968 articles with questionable conclusions. Today, AA males represent 6.5 percent of the USA population. They commit 52% of the murders in our country. Police kill. It is part of their job and hopefully for just causes. (Romans 13 if any doubts persist on this.) Cops killing kill 32% black, 61 % white. Using raw numbers, more whites are killed by cops. Statistically adjusted, Cops actually have been very lenient with AA crime, tougher on white crime. If blacks want parity (justice) with whites based upon numbers of crimes, then more black killings by cops are in order. What BLM is looking for is special privilege, not justice.
    . . . .
    The BLM movement was borne out of the killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson Missouri. Officer Daren Wilson was investigated by a hostile multi-racial grand jury and a follow-up investigation by a hostile DOJ under the watchful eye of Eric Holder who never supported the law enforcement community in his tenure as attorney general. Darren Wilson was cleared of wrong doing because of the strength of the forensic evidence. 60 witnesses came forward. 52 attested Michael Brown was surrendering when shot. 8 said otherwise. Why did he go Wilson get acquitted with 52 persons testifying he murdered Michael. Because forensic evidence trumps all other evidences. The raw facts spoke otherwise. 52 African American perjured themselves seeking to lynch Daren Wilson. Why were the 52 liars not prosecuted? Special Privilege. The 8 witnesses who backed Wilson’s story were asked why they were reluctant to come forward. They were afraid for their lives. The liberal AA community is seeking actively to lynch innocent law enforcement personnel and the BLM movement is at the center of this evil undertaking. All others are bullied into silence.
    . . . .
    My question for Jacob Quick is beside doing sub-par research, you have posted a false witness. Is the forgotten 9th commandment still in your Bible and are you willing to repent. Targeting “white” Christian is overly broad and ignores that the center of racism in America has not been whites but atheist liberals and more specifically the Democratic party whose armed militia, the KKK, between 1865 and 1965 lynched 3436 blacks and 1297 white republicans. My warning to Mr. Quick is “special privileged” is the road to perdition. You will continue to kill the black race as LBJ in 1965 conspired to do, NOT Nixon.

    1. chriscamsmith Avatar
      chriscamsmith

      The racism and extreme political partisanship in your comment disqualifies you from participating in these conversations on a very respectable website such as this one. I am just commenting to ensure that your sick vitriol doesn’t infect any readers here. Your misuse of statistics is appalling. For instance, you are correct that police kill more white people according to raw numbers, however, when adjusted according to a group’s proportion of the population, black men are 3.5 times more likely to be killed by police officers than whites. One very astute explanation for this is the notion of the black body as “dangerous” and “menacing.” This would explain why officers sometimes shoot way to quick with black men upon any slight instance of flinching. Cops are not trained to shoot on a flinch or small movement nor do they have to right. A properly trained officer should be able to discern a threatening movement from a non-threatening one. Perhaps your most egregious and disgusting idea is the KKK as the Democratic Party’s “armed militia.” The relationship between those two organizations was far more nuanced than your comment portrays. Also, for much of the Democratic Party’s history, they were the more socially conservative party. The Republican Party throughout much of its history was much more progressive. Yet even that is a bit of an oversimplification. The parties have never been as ideologically polarized as they are today.

  4. chriscamsmith Avatar
    chriscamsmith

    I commend you for having the courage to write this article. Unfortunately, even the most thoughtful, intelligent, and respectable of us white Christians fail to hear the cries of our black brothers and sisters. I continue to be appalled by the unfortunate vitriol and hatred that has been spewed against the BLM movement. No one is claiming the movement is perfect or that their methods are the best, but the overall message of the group is important.

  5. Anthony Maynard Avatar
    Anthony Maynard

    Wonderful article. Very edifying.

Leave a Reply

Conciliar Post

Conciliar Post is an online community and archive devoted to thoughtful Christian reflection. Since its founding, the site has published theological conversations, reflections on Christianity, reviews, and commentary on culture and current events from a Christian perspective.

Top Posts

The Old Testament in OrderDecember 13, 2024Jacob Prahlow
The New Testament in OrderApril 14, 2021Jacob Prahlow
How the Christ Defined the ChristianAugust 15, 2025Matthew Bryan
Why Liturgy?December 2, 2016Wesley Walker
Life After Life After DeathOctober 7, 2024Jacob Prahlow

Discover more from Conciliar Post

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading