The Bible in Thirty Chapters

What If…

The Bible is a pretty large book. Although we might not immediately think of it as such, how many other 2,128-page1 books do you have laying around your home? Or which reader has four different versions of the Complete Works of William Shakespeare on their bookshelf? The Bible is unique, not only for its contents, but also for its construction and history.

Though rightly regarded as the most important book you could ever own or read, modern Christians often fail to recognize the unique place in history we inhabit when it comes to accessing and understanding the Bible. For much of history, most Christians did not have access to the entire Bible. The first pandect (Bible in one book) was produced in the 8th century.2 Even after the invention of the printing press and the proliferation of Bibles in vernacular languages, many Christians only had access to particular books or collections of books in the Bible.

This reality got me thinking: what if I only had access to a couple of biblical books? Which ones would I want to have? My particular fondness for Luke and John would make those gospels priorities for me. Genesis, Exodus, and Deuteronomy are vital for understanding God’s covenant with Israel, so those would be useful too. I might be a terrible theologian if I did not have a copy of Romans and a terrible 21st century Christian if I did not at least consider having Revelation. Simply imagining life without the whole canon serves as an important reminder of how blessed and privileged we are to live with access to multiple copies and versions of the entire Bible.

Thinking Smaller

However, as anyone who has read extensively in the biblical text knows, no biblical book contains within its scope the entire story of God’s People, the whole history of salvation, or even every key doctrinal point.3 Having access to certain books, therefore, might still leave a reader relatively uninformed about the biblical metanarrative, the overarching story of the Bible. This reality led me to reflect further: what if, instead of whole books, we only had access to certain chapters of the Bible? What if we only had access to, say, thirty chapters of the Bible: which ones would we want to have?

Before proceeding, I want to note a couple of things about what follows. First, this is an exercise in theological reflection. Far be it from me to suggest stripping the Bible down for parts or ignoring chapters which do not appear on this list. Second, I hasten to note the importance of reading all portions of the Bible in their literary contexts. Chapters in the Bible were not original to the text, having only been added in the 13th century.4 Even though this exercise is somewhat arbitrary, then, the process of focusing and limiting the Biblical text does reveal much about our theological commitments.

Finally, this list arises from my own concerns and contexts. The foci of these chapters are the biblical metanarrative (creation, fall, redemption, restoration), the history of Israel, the life and work of Jesus, and the message of the Church. Of course, there are plenty of other themes and messages to be highlighted by this type of exercise. Without further preparation, these are the thirty chapters I would use to summarize the Bible:

The Bible in Thirty Chapters

Genesis 1-3: Creation, Fall, and Curse

Genesis 12, 15: Call and Covenant with Abram

Exodus 12: Passover Initiated

Exodus 14: Crossing of the Red Sea

Deuteronomy 5-6: Ten Commandments and Heart of the Torah

Psalm 23: The Good Shepherd

Psalm 106: Summary of Israel’s History

Isaiah 53: The Suffering Servant

Ezekiel 37: Dry Bones and Restoration of Israel

Matthew 5-7: Sermon on the Mount

Luke 22-24: Lord’s Supper, Passion, Death, Resurrection, and Ascension of Jesus

John 3-4: Born Again of Living Water

Acts 7: Summary of Israel’s Rebellion and Stoning of Stephen

Acts 26: Life of the Apostle Paul

Romans 9: God’s Continuing Covenant with Israel and Inclusion of the Gentiles

1 Corinthians 11(17)-12: Lord’s Supper, Spiritual Gifts, and Ecclesiology

Galatians 3: Abraham, the Law, and Faith in Christ

Hebrews 1: Christology and Superiority of Jesus

1 John 3: Children of God and Law of Love

Revelation 21: New Heavens and New Earth

What do you think of this list? Which chapters would you remove? What other chapters would you include?


[wpex more=”View Sources” less=”Hide Sources”]
1 The number of pages the in NRSV Bible on my desk.
2 Codex Amiantinus, a Vulgate edition prepared as a gift for Pope Gregory II.
3 Arguments for a Protestant reading of Paul’s Epistle to the Romans or a liturgically-informed reading of the Gospel of John fail to entirely convince me here, as both of these approaches present considerable contextual problems and often neglect important components of Israel’s story.
4 Alternative systems were devised by Archbishop Stephen Langton and Cardinal Hugo de Sancto Caro, with modern Biblical chapters deriving primarily from Langton’s system.

Image courtesy of Mars Hill Church Seattle.
[/wpex]

Comments

13 responses to “The Bible in Thirty Chapters”

  1. Vincent Artale jr Avatar
    Vincent Artale jr

    I would also include Gen 6 & Gen 10…

  2. […] via The Bible in Thirty Chapters — Conciliar Post […]

  3. Peter Schellhase Avatar
    Peter Schellhase

    This has a lot of potential as the outline for an introduction to the Bible course, either at a school or for catechesis.

    1. Jacob Prahlow Avatar

      My thoughts as well. Hoping to use this (or something akin to it) as a framework for an entry-level undergraduate course or two.

  4. Benjamin Winter Avatar
    Benjamin Winter

    I know you sort of cover prophetic speech with some passages from the Psalms and from Isaiah, but if it were me I’d include something like “Let justice roll down like waters,” from Amos 5!

    1. Jacob Prahlow Avatar

      Excellent suggestion. Micah 6 was in the running for a bit, but I’ll have to consider Amos 5 as well.

  5. Aron Wall Avatar

    2 Samuel 7 (or if you prefer, 1 Chronicles 17) seems like one of the most critical passages in the Old Testament, insofar as most of the later Messianic passages refer back to that one.

    If I had to pick just one chapter from Romans, surely it would be 8! It not only sums up his argument about the past and present, but also transitions into the new creation.

    For the theme of social justice, I would favor Isaiah 58…

    1. Jacob Prahlow Avatar

      Great suggestions Aron! I really wrestled with which part(s) of Romans to include. 6-8 are, of course, very important. I’ve been thinking more about 1-3 and 12 though too. I want to resist the Protestant-inclination to focus too much on Romans though. But it’s a tough call.

      JJP

  6. J. Dickey Avatar

    I teach a community college class on the Bible as a great work of literature in 16 weeks. I do 8 weeks on the Hebrew Bible and 8 weeks on the New Testament. So I basically have to do your Cliff Notes approach to the Bible. A few of my personal favorites you didn’t mention– Ex. 3 (Burning Bush and Revealing of Divine Name), Ex. 19 (Covenant Formed at Mt. Sinai), 1 Sam. 1-2 (Story of Hannah and her song), Job 1-2, 42 (Brief look at story of Job and issue of theodicy), Psalm 1 (as a preface to and summary of all the psalms), Proverbs 9 (Wisdom and Folly’s Houses), Isaiah 1 (as biblical prophecy in a nutshell), Lk. 10 (Good Samaritan), Lk. 15 (Prodigal Son), Acts 2 (birth of church), Romans 8 (new life in Christ), 1 Corinthians 13 (love), Hebrews 11 (hall of faith), and James 2 (faith and works).

    A lot of the ones you listed are also in my cliff notes version, but those are some of mine that weren’t on your list. Tough to only pick 30 though! Can’t we have like 50?

    P.S.– Don’t tell Luther that James makes it into my canon within the canon.

    1. J. Dickey Avatar

      And 1 Corinthians 15! Resurrection of the Dead.

    2. Jacob Prahlow Avatar

      These are some great suggestions J, thanks for sharing! I had not considered 1 Sam 1-2 or James 2 (maybe a bit of my own latent Lutheranism there?) at all.

      I’m curious, do you do any “full books” for your class? Or does the cliff notes approach work sufficiently well for you?

      JJP

      1. J. Dickey Avatar

        My thought is this: I am worried that if I assign entire books to be read by students, they won’t actually read any of the biblical text. However, I feel like if I just give the most important selections, they may actually read. So I am willing to condense the Bible if it means that students will actually read the biblical text. Keep in mind that my class is an intro level course at a public community college. I try not to place excessive reading burdens on my students. Since I only assign selections, I also typically only lecture on those assigned chapters. Once again, I’d rather my students have some understanding of key selections rather than overwhelm them with too much content in 16-weeks.

      2. Jacob Prahlow Avatar

        Totally understand, and (especially in your context) that makes perfect sense. I appreciate your allowing me to peer into your pedagogical mind. Thanks! JJP

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Conciliar Post

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading